iv. If the Court concludes that a case is made out to grant interim compensation, it will also have to apply its mind to the quantum of interim compensation to be granted. While doing so, the Court ...

The requirement for separate charges stems from the bedrock principle that each distinct offence deserves individual scrutiny and adjudication. This ensures: ...

Anticipatory breach of contract in India is primarily governed by Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This section states that when a party refuses to perform or disables themselves from ...

It is obvious that due to the ban imposed by the Government of India, the aforesaid application bearing the trade mark TikTok cannot be used in India. This would be irrelevant for determining the ...

Advancing justice through DNA technology requires adherence to strict quality assurance standards, including laboratory ...

The Court emphasized that "such ad-interim reliefs have their own legal implications" and referenced the Srikant Upadhyay & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr. (2024) case, which stressed caution in ...

In Indian criminal law, motive and intention are distinct concepts that serve different purposes in determining criminal liability. While often used interchangeably in casual conversation, they have ...

Under Indian law, cross objections and cross appeals serve similar purposes but have distinct procedural characteristics. Here are the key distinctions: ...

The Supreme Court has established specific considerations for granting anticipatory bail in SC & ST Atrocity cases following the 2018 amendment to Section 18 of the Act. Here are the key ...

Upon applicability of aforesaid judgments, it is thus evident as has been observed herein above that there is no specific intention indicated in the subsequent enactment of BNSS 2023 to continue with ...

Once an eviction order is passed, the tenant loses their statutory protection and remains in possession only by virtue of the stay order, not by any right under the Rent Control Act. This legal ...

In summary, while neither the prosecution nor accused can apply for charge alteration as a matter of right, appellate courts retain the discretionary power to alter charges on their own, provided they ...