Anticipatory breach of contract in India is primarily governed by Section 39 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This section states that when a party refuses to perform or disables themselves from ...

The requirement for separate charges stems from the bedrock principle that each distinct offence deserves individual scrutiny and adjudication. This ensures: ...

DNA technology has fundamentally revolutionized the criminal justice system, transforming how forensic investigations are ...

It is obvious that due to the ban imposed by the Government of India, the aforesaid application bearing the trade mark TikTok cannot be used in India. This would be irrelevant for determining the ...

Advancing justice through DNA technology requires adherence to strict quality assurance standards, including laboratory ...

The Court emphasized that "such ad-interim reliefs have their own legal implications" and referenced the Srikant Upadhyay & Ors. v. State of Bihar & Anr. (2024) case, which stressed caution in ...

The Jitendra Kumar Rode judgment represents more than a procedural victory—it exposes the inadequacy of traditional ...

In Indian criminal law, motive and intention are distinct concepts that serve different purposes in determining criminal liability. While often used interchangeably in casual conversation, they have ...

Under Indian law, cross objections and cross appeals serve similar purposes but have distinct procedural characteristics. Here are the key distinctions: ...

Once an eviction order is passed, the tenant loses their statutory protection and remains in possession only by virtue of the stay order, not by any right under the Rent Control Act. This legal ...

The court established a fundamental distinction that will govern future interpretation of state amendments. Justice Mathur definitively held that state legislative enactments under Article 246 of the ...

In a significant judgment delivered on April 8, 2025, the Supreme Court of India addressed a crucial legal question: Can a ...